Back to NI-Stack Pitch Deck
Due Diligence Briefing

3 Key Questions for Chief AI Officers

Before scaling any LLM architecture in the enterprise, the Board must demand verifiable answers to the Compute, Compliance, and Context crises.

01. COMPUTE BANKRUPTCY

How do you scale LLM inference without bankrupting your compute budget?

OpenAI's compute spend reached $50B in 2026, leading to a projected $14B net loss. Every enterprise deploying AI faces the exact same thermodynamic reality: compute scales linearly with usage, but value does not.

Currently, up to 29% of every inference dollar is wasted on re-processing static conversational history (context drag) and running GPU-heavy safety classifiers just to block basic prompt injections.

The NI-Stack Solution: Structural Compression

The NI-Stack dissolves this contradiction. ORACLE replaces entire conversation histories with 64-byte BLAKE3 hash pointers, achieving 99.7% context compression. STENO losslessly compresses outputs via RL-learned shorthand. AEGIS filters 36% of adversarial traffic on CPU before the GPU ever fires.

29%
Token Savings
0
GPUs for Safety
1 Line
Code Change
02. REGULATORY LIABILITY

How do you guarantee EU AI Act compliance without paralyzing inference latency?

EU AI Act Article 53 requires continuous monitoring and Article 14 requires explainability. Enterprises attempt to solve this by storing petabytes of raw inference logs, creating massive honeypots of PII and destroying query latency via database writes.

Non-compliance leads to fines of up to €35,000,000 or 7% of global annual turnover. Yet, real-time logging adds 150-400ms of latency per request.

The NI-Stack Solution: Cryptographic LEDGER

LEDGER replaces petabytes of text logs with a Post-Quantum (ML-DSA) signed hash-chain. It proves exactly what the AI was asked, and what it answered, without storing the plaintext. It guarantees absolute compliance in just 64 bytes per request, reducing liability to zero while adding less than 0.2ms latency.

03. RAG DATA LEAKAGE

How do you prevent proprietary RAG data from leaking into public foundational models?

When you feed your company's most sensitive internal documents into a RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) pipeline, those tokens are sent to external model providers (OpenAI, Anthropic). If a user executes a sophisticated indirect prompt injection (e.g., hidden instructions inside a resume), the AI can be manipulated into exfiltrating your RAG context via URL encoding.

The NI-Stack Solution: SCRIBE & AEGIS Shielding

SCRIBE utilizes a φ-threshold to aggressively prune irrelevant RAG context BEFORE it reaches the external API, ensuring only the bare minimum data is exposed. Meanwhile, the AEGIS cascade acts as an impenetrable firewall (115 CPU/NPU agents), identifying and neutralizing indirect payload extractions and adversarial jailbreaks with 12-Sigma precision (99.9999998% accuracy) before the LLM can process them.

Ready to deploy the Sovereign Baseline?

Test the API (Zero Friction)